As
Chinese equities continued to hammered second day after 5% drop on first day of
week today again it took deep around 4.5% and so far recovered but still deep
red with 2.5% losses on the day with great fear of credit crunch though In a statement on
Monday, PBOC said the liquidity
in the financial system was “reasonable” and that lenders must manage their own
liquidity risks.
Last week U.S. investors
have been paralyzed by concerns about the Federal Reserve turning off the
easy-money spigot, but Wall Street has started this week fretting about another
central bank: China’s.
The credit crunch in China was brought to the forefront by the Shanghai
Composite plummeting 5.3% overnight into bear-market territory after the
People’s Bank of China refused to loosen monetary policy in response to
country’s worsening liquidity squeeze.
After watching China’s total credit explode from $9 trillion in 2008
to about $23 trillion today, the new government in Beijing now seems ready to
ease off the stimulus gas pedal.
“The signal being sent is they are willing to tolerate slower
growth in the interest of reforming the system. Long term it’s good, but short
term it’s very scary for the markets,” said Win Thin, global head of emerging
market currency strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman.
The PBoC’s hawkish stance is akin to “telling a child you’re not
going to give him any more sugar even though the sugar makes you feel better
and gives you a sugar high,” Anthony Chan, chief economist at J.P. Morgan’s (JPM)
Chase Private Client, told FOX Business. “It’s for your own good, but it
doesn’t feel good.”
Liquidity Squeeze Fallout
It didn’t feel very good to be bullish on risky assets on Monday
as the Shanghai Composite suffered the equivalent of an 800-point meltdown, its
worst single day since August 2009. The steep selloff left China’s benchmark
20% below recent highs, or technically in a bear market.
The Chinese yuan took its biggest tumble in six weeks and the Dow
Industrials lost as much as 248 points before rebounding, while the S&P 500
has retreated as much as 6.14% from its all-time high of 1687.
“Never has the interconnectedness of global markets been on more
display,” Peter Kenny, chief market strategist at Knight Capital Group (KCG),
wrote in a note to clients.
So what exactly is happening in China’s banking system and why do
U.S. investors care?
Similar to the U.S. real-estate bubble that eventually popped in
2007-2008, China appears to now be working off the excesses of explosive credit
growth.
Credit Bubble?
According to Barclays (BCS),
total credit in China has skyrocketed to $23 trillion and credit-to-GDP levels
have raced to 200% from 75%.
While China’s overall GDP has slowed below the 10%-12% range of
recent years, credit continues to boom at about 20% year-over-year, Barclays
said.
“Total social finance, which includes the shadow banking market,
is growing way out of control,” said Chan.
In response, the PBoC has taken a much more hawkish position,
refusing to inject as much liquidity as the banking system had gotten
accustomed to.
At the same time, China has suffered from a drop of
foreign-exchange inflows in recent weeks and months.
The credit crunch is best demonstrated by looking at China’s
seven-day repo rate. This measure of short-term borrowing costs in the
interbank market has surged to 12% as of June 20 from just 3% a month earlier,
Barclays said, calling the move an “extraordinary spike.” The repo rate has
retreated to 7.32% this week, but that is still seen as elevated.
“The distress in China’s fixed income markets is palpable,”
Barclays said in a report released late last week. “The dilemma for
policymakers is pretty clear -- while the interbank market is experiencing a
credit crunch, the overall leverage ratio is probably already too high.”
‘New Sheriff in Town’
Rather than come to the rescue of the banks, the PBoC on Sunday
agreed to “fine-tune policy when necessary,” but did not announce any new
measures and said it’s comfortable with liquidity levels.
The PBoC statement “suggests to us that the policy objectives have
not changed,” Zhiwei Zhang, an economist at Nomura, wrote in a note. “The
financial risks in the economy are not yet fully under control. Policy
tightening only started in mid-March, and a shift of policy to an easing bias
would exacerbate these financial risks.”
The hawkish tone underscores the new Chinese administration’s goal
to reform the country’s economy into something that is more sustainable and
market based.
“There is a new sheriff in town in China and for all the short
term pain a crackdown on excess leverage will have, it is the proper long term
strategy,” Peter Boockvar, lead portfolio manager at Morgan Stanley’s (MS)
Excelsior Wealth Management, wrote in a note. “Unlike with the Fed, Chinese
officials have had enough of the rampant credit growth that has so distorted
their economy.”
Yet the tighter policy also comes on top of recent indicators
revealing activity in the Chinese manufacturing sector shrank in June to a
nine-month low.
“It’s quite startling that manufacturing actually contracted. The
banking system is exacerbating the slowdown,” said Jeffrey Bergstrand, a
finance professor at the University of Notre Dame.
Now What?
China’s willingness to stomach slower growth and a deleveraging
process has spooked investors worried about the short-term impact on an
increasingly interconnected global economy.
As the world’s second-largest economy and largest consumer or
commodities, China plays an outsized role in the markets.
The metals sector of the commodities complex headed south on
Monday, with copper slumping almost 2% and aluminum maker Alcoa (AA)
retreating 2% to its lowest level since April 2009.
“The world’s second-largest economy was perhaps the last prop
remaining to commodity bulls, but even this now seems lost to them,” Alastair
McCaig, market analyst at IG, wrote in a note.
Barclays warned that some smaller Chinese banks that rely on the
suddenly-tight interbank markets may eventually fail if rates remain high.
It also said the liquidity situation isn't likely to improve in
the coming weeks, barring a strong rebound of foreign-exchange inflows, which doesn't seem likely.
For more info please visit:www.cfb.ae
No comments:
Post a Comment